type checker doesn't reject missing record fields

e4a9bf6
Opened by Graydon Hoare at 2010-07-16 22:23:21

See test compile-fail/rec-missing-fields.rs. Shouldn't compile, does.

  1. Un-XFAIL a couple tests fixed by pcwalton's new typechecker. Closed by 4d413af822aa6249c83efa0fec6fef2570bee232. Closed by 4d413af822aa6249c83efa0fec6fef2570bee232.

    Graydon Hoare at 2010-07-16 22:23:21