debuginfo: nil and bot should not be described as uint in DWARF
d35cf14
Opened by Michael Woerister at
Fixing this pretty much just amounts to changing the name from uint to () and !, respectively, in debuginfo::basic_type_metadata().
I'm guessing the original author meant to have it as
unitand notuint. I'm not sure if that's more appropriate or not than()and!, though it seems like it would be useful to distinguish between the two. I am kind of sad thatDW_ATE_unsignedappears to be the only real good choice for the type encoding, a bit of research shows instances of implementations that use what appears to be a non-standardDW_ATE_voidwhich may be more appropriate, but...Michael Letterle at 2013-11-02 03:50:57